celebrated his 100th birthday yesterday by flying a p-51 mustang fighter jet over his neighborhood in georgia. how cool is that? crawford piloted the mustang more than 70 years ago in china. his family and friends say he flew almost 30 missions before he was shot down, celebrated 100 by flying it again this week. congratulations. tomorrow on "special report," democratic senator chris coons on federal government spending priorities and foreign policy hot spots for president biden. talk about the campaign well remember if you can't catch us live set your dvr 6:00 p.m. in the east and 3:00 p.m. on the west coast. thanks for inviting us into your home tonight and every night. that's it for "special report" fair, balanced andnd still unafraid. ingraham angle with laura starts now. ♪ ♪ >> judge jeanine: i'm judge jeanine pirro in for laura

ingraham and this is a special edition of "the ingraham angle." breaking late tonight oversight chair james comer says he is inviting president biden to testify before the committee about his family's business dealings. that same committee today held a hearing that his son hunter biden begged for. remember how he said he wanted to clear his name in public? well, in true hunter fashion, he did not keep his commitment. >> should i allow hunter to give his opening statement first? >> well it, doesn't appear mr. biden showed up for his public hearing we'll recognize you, mr. bobulinski. >> thank you, mr. chairman. >> judge jeanine: hunter isn't just a crook, he is also a coward. look, maybe he realized everyone would see right through his lies and maybe he realized this would be detrimental to his father's re-election campaign. or maybe hunter wouldn't be able to defend his position that his father knew nothing about his business dealings given his own

laptop and the circumstantial evidence contained therein. not to mention his former business partner's testimonies. >> i want to be crystal clear. >> my direct personal experience and what i have subsequently come to learn it is clear to me that joe biden was the brand being sold by the family o -- biden family. joe biden was more than a participant in and a beneficiary of his family's business. he was an active, aware, enablers who met with business associates such as myself to further the business despite being buffered by a complex scheme to maintain plausible didn't. >> mr. galanis, you said at the beginning that hunter didn't really provide any sort of intellectual provide asset value or anything ever the sort that his entire value was the brand; is that correct? how did you state that? >> yeah, we didn't rely on him for any work product other than delivering the biden lift. >> judge jeanine: the biden lift. something americans aren't

familiar with since jockeys hass has driven the country into the ground. his family's kept getting bigger with each shell company deposit. remember the infamous 10 held by h. for the bogey guy email? hunter denied knows what any of it meant and who the big guy was. >> mr. bobulinski, who is the big guy? >> joe biden. >> you sure? >> i'm a thousand percent sure. and there is other text messages that back that up. >> judge jeanine: but, of course, that wasn't enough for democrats who wanted to completely ignore the testimony being presented. >> did you witness the president commit a crime? is it your testimony that -- >> -- yes. >> and what crime do you -- have you witnessed? >> how much time do i have to go through it? corruption statutes, ricco and conspiracy. >> what is it -- what is it? >> fara. >> what is the crime, sir? >> you. >> specifically. >> you just you ask me to answer the question. i answered the question.

ricco, you are obviously not familiar with corruption. >> excuse me, sir. excuse me, sir. >> fara. >> excuse me, sir. ricco is not a crime. it is a category. what is. >> oh, no. it's a category of crimes that you are then charged under. a long list. >> you have charges? sir, please name. >> exact statute under ricco? >> yes. >> judge jeanine: joining us now is congressman mike waltz of the oversight committee. welcome. oversight committee chair comer is now calling on joe biden to testify before the committee. one, what are the odds he shows up? and two what is the first question you would ask him? >> women, look, i mean, there's the question we have been asking of every one of these witnesses, what was the product? what was the service, what were 27 shell companies established across your entire family while you were a vice president

charged with obama for having policy oversight of china and ukraine of all countries that you are selling? because i think what we have uncovered here and this is bank records, text messages, emails, multiple witness testimony of people with direct knowledge and, judge, you know how important that is, that what he was selling was america. and the -- you know, would very talked about the ukraine pieces, the burisma, the dinners he attended as vice president, russian oligarchs, money transferred. >> money transferred. the piece i know cussed on was china and the chinese communist party. because chinese state owned enterprises, especially cefc and its chairman, who was a direct associate of the chairman of the chinese communist party xi has a long history ever bribing officials and they call it going

after the princelings. the sons of officials to get to key policy makers. in fact, don't take it from us, that chairman ye jianming has since disappeared but many of thinks associates were prosecuted in the southern district of new york for doing exactly that and we saw that exact pattern unfold with hunter biden to his father. >> judge jeanine: the amazing thing they denied they got money from china. right now i'm going to pass it over. congressman, your colleague today, dan goldman, tried to make a point today on the big guy email but it backfired. take a look at this. >> did anyone ever respond to that email? >> yes, they did numerous times. >> sorry. >> hunter biden himself did. >> you are right. >> that's important because hunter biden has claimed that he didn't respond to it and he responded to it. >> you're just going to filibuster. i reclaim my time is running out. but i will say no one responded to the big guy reference for 10. >> thank you for making my point. they didn't have to respond. because they all knew the big

guy was joe biden. >> i reclaim my time. >> judge jeanine: congressman, why do they keep claiming the big guy isn't joe biden? >> well, because -- i mean, look, they are trying to carry his water. and, you know, they are complicit in covering up, i think, one of the largest and most serious corruption scandals in our history. this isn't a corruption scandal with the mafia or some corporation. this is with our greatest adversary that fully intends to defeat us and has a long history through its belt and road initiative of doing scwhacketly what it's done through the biden family. and we have got the receipts. in terms of crimes, since aoc doesn't know what ricco and other crimes are. >> judge jeanine: amazing. >> foreign agents registration act. hunter was clearly acting as a foreign agent. his dad was complicit. they had commingled funds and you can't take foreign money into a relative and then they pay all your bills, whether it is menendez and his wife or joe

biden and hunter biden. it's illegal and we need -- i expect to see referrals for full prosecution. not that this duong would do it but we have got to do it. we owe it to the american people. >> judge jeanine: okay. congressman mike waltz, thanks so much for joining us. joining us now is mike davis, former clerk for justice gorsuch and president and founder of the article iii project and sol wisenberg former deputy independent counsel and a fox news contributor. you know, mike, there was one moment during today's hearing that stood out. take a look. >> recall a meeting with hubbard devon archer hunter took a call from his father and told him things were going well and that he might need a little help getting across the finish line? >> judge jeanine: mike, what do you glean from that? >> well, i think what this testimony today shows is there is clear evidence that joe biden

lied to the american people and hunter biden lied under oath when they both said that joe biden was not involved in any of hunter's business dealings. that is -- there is clear evidence to the contrary with tony bobulinski and this jason galanis, it's very clear that joe biden was very aware of these foreign business dealings. >> judge jeanine: let's take a listen to what happened a few years ago when joe biden was asked about this. >> i have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings. >> i have never discussed with my son or my brother or anyone else anything having to do with their businesses, period. >> there is zero, zero, zero, zero evidence of any assertion being made. >> judge jeanine: all right, sol, i will go to you on this. you know, the zero zero zero evidence and the evolving story and now we have got the bank records and the shell companies. what do you make of this?

>> well, there is nothing to make of it other than that the president has repeatedly lied about this. and we have known it for quite a while. and apparently that doesn't bother him. he shamelessly does it across the variety of topics. what i thought was interesting today was that bobulinski, i thought, was a very powerful witness. he has obviously been waiting to testify for a long time. his tmg testimony was raw and a. i thought it made it more powerful. and, unlike some of the other people testifying, he doesn't have anything he can really be impeached with in terms of his background. is he a real patriot. so, i thought they were very worried about it and you saw that in their efforts in their answers, democrats in questions to shift the topic and particularly pathetic was aoc who doesn't even know that ricco

is not a category. ricco is a criminal statute. 18 usc 1962. you can look it up. >> judge jeanine: thank you, sol. thank you. you know, mike, it really is amazing because bobulinski came out and said hunter lied take a listen. >> here is one recent example of hunter's perjury. he lied to the committee on important details concerning his money demands and threats to cfc and text messages on july 30th and 31st, 2017. he leveraged his father's presence next to him in that infamous text to strong arm cfc to paying off hunter immediately. >> judge jeanine: all right, mike, if hunter biden lied in his testimony what does that mean for him? >> well, it means he should face perjury charges but we have the biden justice department who th's gone out of its way for years to go after trump h his top aides, his lawyers, his january 6th supporters parents and christians while they give amnesty to joe biden, hunter

biden, james biden, the corrupt biden family and their political allies. we have a politicized and weaponized justice system and that's not going to change until president trump is back in office on january 20th, 2025. >> judge jeanine: you know, sol, it's amamazing. the one individual who testified earlier who was a partner of jason galanis of hunter biden. i mean, he had nothing to gain. we all know that witnesses look who has something to gain and lose? this guy is in jail. it's not like the biden department of justice is going to do him any favors. he came right out and said he was a partner and joe biden knew about it. >> right of course, in any criminal trial, however, he would be impeachable precisely because he is in prison. and they don't have that with bobulinski. i think that's very -- i think that's an important point. and i think that -- i looked at the transcript of hunter biden's testimony. and i think he was very, very careful. he might have been literally

truthful in some of his answers because he had a good attorney there with him. and that's precisely why he didn't want to appear today. he didn't want to appear in the faceoff that he couldn't control. he always wants to be in a tightly controlled environment. but, i certainly agree with what mike says, there is no way this justice department would ever bring charges against him. >> judge jeanine: that's the sad part. mike and sol, thanks so much for being with us tonight. and donald trump unleashes on letitia james over her plans to take trump tower. what the former president just said. plus, just how dangerous is tiktok? senator josh hawley got a closed door intel briefing and is here with the details, next. ♪

- [speaker] at first, just leaving the house was hard. - [speaker] but wounded warrior project helps you realize it's possible to get out there - [speaker] to feel sense of camaraderie again. - [speaker] to find the tools to live life better. - [narrator] through generous community support, we've connected warriors and their families with no cost physical and mental health services, legislative advocacy, career assistance, and life skill training for 20 years, and we are just getting started.

( ♪ ) my back got injured very bad. i was off work for about a year. i heard about relief factor from my wife. i took it every day, three times a day, for three weeks. look at her and i said, "the pain is gone." and she said, i'm glad it helped. i said, "no, you don't understand. it's gone." you, too, can feel better every day with relief factor, a daily supplement that fights pain naturally. call or go online now for our 3-week quickstart, just $19.95.

♪ >> this filing from the attorney general's office is basically saying too bad, so sad. a.g. would be g to let the court basically hold some of his property in escrow. essentially hand over the keys to your buildings or your plan, perhaps. >> panic mode unfold is setting. in trump himself becoming increasingly concerned that the optics that that march 25th deadline could bring being he is someone long tied his identity to his wealth. >> judge jeanine: the left loves watching their lawfare in action

and today new york attorney general told an appeals court to ignore donald trump's claim that it's impossible to find an insurance company to back his nearly half a billion dollars bond. in a new court filing, the attorney general's office said, quote: the use of real estate as collateral for an appeal bond is hardly impossible as a general matter, closed quote. if trump does not post bond by monday, letitia james could start the process of seizing his properties. joining me now is david schoen, former trump impeachment lawyer. you know, david, i have to ask you this: where does the organizattorney general say he t get a bond? are you familiar with any private company in a state case like this getting a bond for 450 million. it's 120% of the judgment which is a half a billion dollars. >> yeah. absolutely not. the attorney general is divorce

from reality here. you can be sure president trump is trying to get a bond. you can be sure he has the contacts to get one if it were possible. these insurance companies just won't do it. there is too much at risk. it's outrageous that one is required in this case. understand, this under cpr 5519 if you know, judge, if this were the state appealing they wouldn't need to put up any bond at all. it's an outrageous situation. >> judge jeanine: time is of the essence. you know that. county federal courts step in on the 8th amendment excessive fines? >> i think it would be difficult for the federal court to do based on younger extension. they will not interfere with a state without proceeding. still got the new york court of appeals. the public certainly wants the issues in this case to be heard. remember beside the excessive fines issues he was denied a right to you a jury trial. the case that says you don't get a jury trial comes out of that county and says it's not punitive damages.

it's a regulatory statute. in this case it's punitive. he should have had the right to a jury trial. >> judge jeanine: it's not only punitive. they got numbers out of the air. i mean, there is nothing that connects it to reality and no victim. i mean, you got a fraud case are with no fraud, no victim. and everybody made money. but, in the end, if she were to go to court and start the mechanism to seize the properties, you know, she is not limited to new york we know she can go to florida as well. how does that work? i mean, she just goes in and says i'm the new landlord? how does it work? >> no. shoe going to have to use proper court procedures. and that will drag on for a while also. who needs that kind of subsidiary litigation? it's absurd. >> the issues in this case are matters of public interest. the court should wave a bond all together. find that they're likely to succeed on the merits. there is irreparable harm and the equities balanced together say let's go forward with the appeal and hear the case on the merits. >> judge jeanine: what's the harm? i love this case in georgia. now, fani, well, the judge in

the fani willis case where they got rid of the lover but not fani basically the judge says i'm going to allow interlocutory appeal. normally to the georgia appellate court it. normally takes 45 days, the judge signaling that before it goes to trial suggests to me maybe he wasn't too sure about his own decision. what say you? >> well, this judge has done a terrific job so far i think. is he a real straight arrow wheamplet said is the issues in this case, especially regarding ms. willis are so important it's appropriate for the court to hear it by way of interlocutory appeal. however, he said, is he going to go forward and consider the other pre-trial motions and so on. he is not going to wait for a decision with respect to that. but, listen from, what we saw ms. willis and her testimony, they might well be better off keeping her on the case. >> judge jeanine: you know, i think they should have kept wade on the case the way that guy was sweating bullets when he was on the stand. can you tell he has never been in a courtroom before. the one of the problems is you have got the georgia senate

investigating her and another agency investigating her. i was a prosecutor for along time. you cannot take forfeiture money and give it to your lover. you just can't do that. >> yeah. no, listen, she is completely smear the integrity of this process. she suspect for election. >> so she is probably not going to step down voluntarily. but she should have. she should have withdrawn from the case for the good of the case and integrity of the system. that's not what she decided to do. >> judge jeanine: we will see what the appellate court does. i have my opens on that one. david, thanks so much. and intel officials came to capitol hill today with a stark warning for senators. tiktok is dangerous. the message seemed to land. >> my reaction to this briefing is that tiktok is a gun aimed at americans' heads. the chinese communists are weaponizing information that they are constantly surreptitiously collecting from 170 million americans. >> tiktok and bytedance and

chinese leaders go to great lengths to try to conceal what they are doing. but it's clear right there in the terms and conditions what they can do. and it's clear from two weeks ago how tiktok is used to try to influence american politics. >> judge jeanine: all right. joining me now is missouri senator josh hawley. senator, your colleagues sound very concerned about what they heard today. what have they told you? >> what think have said is tiktok is a national security threat. you heard it right there, judge. the truth is tiktok is a back door for the chinese communist party into every phone in america that has tiktok loaded on to it. i mean, they are tracking our location. they are tracking our key strokes. they are tracking our emails, our contacts. you name it. and all of this can be accessed by the chinese communist party in beijing. my bottom line is this: i don't want the chinese communist owning our farmland. i don't want them owning our factories. i don't want them owning our social media. to me, that's what this is about. >> judge jeanine: i would like you to listen to one of your colleagues on this, senator

tillis. >> okay, listen. if you ban tiktok, i will find you and shoot you. [laughter] um, that's people's jobs and that's my only entertainment. and people make money off there, too. you know, i'm trying to get rich like that. anyways, i will shoot you and find you and cut you into pieces. [laughter] , bye. >> judge jeanine: all right. that, of course, is a voice mail that senator tillis received. it's frightening, although they are laughing about it, senator. your take? >> well, i mean it's crazy. it shows you the length that tiktok is willing to go, judge, to try to weaponize their own users and exploit them. this really gets to the basic point no. american should be dependent on this chinese platform no. american should have information subject to chinese censors and getting manipulated by people tiktok and chinese owners are

trying to american citizens and teenagers. there is a reason tiktok doesn't want to sell. they could he will is the company, right? there is a research beijing won't let that happen. it's not about the money. it's way too valuable to them. >> judge jeanine: it's about control. the house passed legislation to make bytedance sell off tiktok. what is the senate going to do? >> the senate should pass it. i mean, i'm worried that tiktok is trying to buy the senate. judge, tiktok already owns or china already owns our farmland. they own our factories, they want to enothe senate. they are spending money. believe me as you and i talk right now they are spending money to try to buy votes in the senate. we can't not let that happen. we need to show that american people are still in charge of american social media and all of american media and we need to ban tiktok in the united states. if china won't sell it, then we need to ban it. >> >> judge jeanine: thank you so much for being with us tonight. if you heard the president's

bloodbath hoax made you mad? wait until you hear joe biden's ridiculous new smear on donald trump. that's next. ♪ you might want to pray with us. well, not the actual jesus. obviously, but let's spend some time with the real one. lord jesus. we take this moment today to simply be with you. we are lost. we are broken. but we are not alone. help us to grow closer to you. this lent, jesus name we pray. amen. join us in prayer. this lent on hallow.

oh, it's cold outside. time to protect your vehicle from winter's wrath. of course, the hot sun can be tough on vehicles too. you need weathertech. laser measured floorliners and cargo liner will shield the carpeting from sand and snow. for your interior, there's seat protector and sunshade. plus, mud flaps and bumpstep for the exterior. while the new impactliner, with shock absorbing rings, safeguards your truck bed from costly damage. order american made products at wt.com surf's up!

>> judge jeanine: i know under this administration you are used to illegals crossing the border and then never getting detorted, but, in some instances, they actually do get caught. fox's own bill melugin got the chance to ride along with ice officers in l.a. as they tracked down dangerous criminal aliens. bill? >> bill: well, judge, because of sanctuary policies here in california, ice essentially has to work alone when they go after dangerous criminal aliens. here in the streets of l.a. we embedded with ice, as they removed three convicted felons off the streets. >> controlled substance. >> >> it's 4:00 a.m. in los angeles. this team of ice deportation officers is briefing on their

targets for the day. drug traffickers with lengthy criminal histories. the first target, a mexican woman, previously convicted of trafficking opioids in l.a. >> she was selling these opioids from a shop at one of the local areas and distributing to minors. >> after surveilling the area, she spotted leaving her home in a pickup truck. ice officers swarnld the street pulled the woman over and arrested her. ice says she is a convicted felon who has already been deported from the u.s. four times. during her intake, ice found thousands of dollars of cash on her. >> convicted felon that ice just arrested is behind me being processed and booked right now and ice tells us, because of her criminal history, she can be deported as soon as tonight. >> moments later, ice officers bring in another convicted felon they have just arrested. a mexican man with convictions for trafficking meth and domestic violence. >> sanctuary policies

unfortunately not being honored. >> it is frustrating. >> do you guys have any presence at the jail whatsoever? >> no. >> and ice blames those sanctuary policies for having to arrest this third felon of the day. previously convicted of trafficking meth and being a felon in possession of a gun. and ice says he was released without notice after local authorities ignored their request to hold him. >> sanctuary policy? >> sanctuary policy. detainer not honored. >> ice says their l.a. officers arrested over 3,000 criminal non-citizens in fiscal year 2023. including 249 suspected gang members. with limited manpower, their priority is public safety threats. >> sex offenders, child molesters. drug traffickers. not out there we indiscriminate there conducting raids at checkpoints that is not true. >> judge ice says frequently rearresting illegal aliens deported from the u.s. sometimes

multiple times. under u.s. law reentry is felony punishable with prison time. ice says they would like federal prosecutors to start imposing more consequences for these repeat crossers. weave will send it back to you. >> judge jeanine: all right, bill. thanks so much. and bracing the momentum from bloodbath hoax earlier this week, biden is seizing on his next manipulation. warping trump's comments about illegal immigration and for that they had to go back to the well. >> 2016 he called latinos criminal drug dealers and rapists when he came down the casey later. now he says immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country. you're the reason why, in large part, i beat donald trump. >> yes. >> let's beat him again. [cheers and applause] >> you know, i need you. i need you badly. i need the help, kamala and i definitely need your help. >> judge jeanine: joining me now is rachel campos-duffy, co-host of "fox & friends weekend." you know, rachel, in one breath he lies about what trump said,

and in the next, he begs for latino support. is anyone falling for this? >> he says i need you badly, stay with me. i'm desperate. he sounds like a really bad boyfriend who has been taking you for granted and he is only noticing you now that you are starting to be interested in the other guy. and i think a lot of latinos are thinking about the other guy. and they are remembering the good times, right, whether they had money, when their wages were higher, when there was less crime. you know, when they could -- when they could do things with their family. also remembering when you could send your little boy to school and nobody told him that he was actually a girl. and they are also, judge, remembering that this guy, joe biden is a stalker. he sends the fbi into your catholic church to spy on you. this idea that hey, look at me, stay with me the other guy is a racist. i don't think it's going to work

this time. i don't think latinos love biden. and, guess what? i don't think they love trump. they love their families. they are looking at this situation at this presidential election and this deterioration of our country and all these wars and all this chaos and inflation, and everything that's happening, and they are saying i want to do what's best for my family, and i think that's where they are at. >> you know, the amazing part of it is as he stands there and begs for their support, it sounded like there were 20 people in the room, but, you know, it's this pandering. like the pandering that we heard in 2020, have that. >> this guy despises latinos, i understand latinos values, you know, they are like -- they wuss celebrated saint patrick's day. i hope you are not offended by my saying this, you know, the thing about irish came here about family, about faith, about decency. >> yeah. >> and that's exactly what a latino community is all about.

>> judge jeanine: well, you know, aside from that, his pandering and saying you know, i love latinos they are like irish people and like i love the music and, i mean, it's not working. people are looking at the economy, inflation, immigration, and, you know, donald trump is winning, and, you know, is he winning in the swing states. so, joe biden can beg all he wants but they are not buying it. >> they are losing latinos and they don't have to lose that many for this to be absolutely devastating for joe biden's campaign. but they are losing latinos for the same reason they are losing auto workers in michigan. latinos are working class people. and so they're looking at the inflation. and the 15 million people who are coming over the border, whatever nationality they are, whether they are latinos, or not, they are a threat to the works class wage, and this is what they're looking at, and that's what they're afraid of. and so, yeah, playing music or

talking about tacos, none of that is going to work, times are really bad. >> and latinos are feeling it just as hard as every white or asian or black working class person. they just want to protect their families in the middle of this. >> judge jeanine: you know, rachel, you are so right. maybe at some point we will just talk about what americans want. thanks so much for being with us tonight. and the liberal media that orchestrated the christine blasey ford attack against kavanaugh is back trying to revive her debunked claims, that's next. ♪

it's upsetting to think people out to get you for telling the truth. >> for trying to help, right? >> even today, some people remain skeptic of your story, after all that you have been through, you have any regrets? would you do it all the same again? >> i would definitely do it again. it was the worst thing ever. >> judge jeanine: she's back. that's right, brett kavanaugh's supposedly camera shy accuser, christine blasey ford is back in the spotlight just in time for election season to promote her new memoir which the atlantic calls a modern day horror story

that reads as an indictment against kavanaugh and his supposed enablers. never mind the fact that her 2018 testimony was riddled with inconsistencies, contradictions and memory lapses. the regime is picking up right where they left off six years ago. here now to react is carrie carrieseverino former clerk to clarence justin thomas and crisis network. and garrett ben tri he was spokesman for the senate judiciary committee during the kavanaugh confirmation hearing. all right, kerry, i will start with you. does ford's timing seem a bit suspect? >> yeah. you know, if you are looking for new information about the christine blasey ford allegations, this is not the place to look. it starts out as an uncorroborated and implausible story. and at the end of the book it is still uncorroborated and implausible story. she brushes over some of the real problems with it, for example, her own friend saying

this is not sound like something we did. this doesn't happen. and i think at the end of the day, yeah, this sems like an attempt to keep kavanaugh in the news and maybe to keep her own name in the news. she is obviously, you know, she talks about things like going to a sleepover at oprah's house and getting to meet metallica back stage. a lot of interesting things have happened since this. and i think, unfortunately, the p.r. team that she details following her through this whole book, seems to be using her, again, to try to get this back in t spotlight. you know, it's an election year so, of course, let's try to bring this topic up again. >> i would like you to listen to this sound where ford talks about why she wrote her memoir. take a listen to this. >> people would say like oh, they are going to ruin your life and say all these very abstract things and i didn't really know what they meant. so this book is a little bit some concrete examples of what might happen and how people might better navigate it because there will be another person. >> judge jeanine: there will be another person.

what do you take from that, garrett? >> well, we saw this was justin thomas, we have seen this now with justice kavanaugh now. it's the playbook of the left to throw last minute allegations to try derail a supreme court nominee. we have seen this over and over again from the left here. i think if you take a step back, her claims in this book are about as accurate like a grown man believing in the tooth fairy, they are just not there. it's ridiculous to believe in them. we saw. this i worked on justice kavanaugh's confirmation. it was very thorough. we literally had two hearings that rarely ever happens. judge kavanaugh at the time had been through three fbi background checks. none of these things ever alleged. and as carrie rightfully pointed out here her main best friend and supposed cooperator had no knowledge of this. two other witnesses outside of justice kavanaugh p.j. smythe, mark judge also said this never happened. she couldn't remember where it happened. she couldn't remember how she got there. how she left. and no one can corroborate it.

it's flimsy and false. >> judge jeanine: the left isn't just gunning for kavanaugh though. the atlantic published a piece this week calling on sonia sotomayor to retire this year arguing if she doesn't she will be making a bet that she will remain fit to serve until possibly age 78 or even 82. if she retires this year, president biden will 234078 nate a young and reliably liberal judge to replace her. the author even goes to point out that justice sotomayor is a diabetic and relatively poor health. carrie, does this surprise you because it shocks me. >> yeah. at this point i don't think we should be surprised but i agree. this is lower blow than i thought. especially for someone who is such a reliable liberal. they are doing things to suggest she ised in n. bad health. there is really no evidence. they are going out of their way. what it does show is the left is very concerned about the upcoming election.

they don't trust president biden to be able to hold on for another four years. but i think it's in horrible taste that they are doing this kind of well you are no more useful to us, let's just push her off. just as they try to do with justice breyer. i think it's a horrible way to treat a justice. it shows you all along whether the liberals or the conservatives. they just want to use the court not for justice, not even for, you know, appreciating their dignity as people. they just want them as a tool to advance liberal ends. so, whatever will do that. in this case, if it's shuffling justice sotomayor off to buffalo a little early, they are going to do that, too. they just want to have the court in democratic and liberal controlled hands. >> judge jeanine: are you shocked by that? i am still stunned. >> yeah. it's absolutely ridiculous here again we saw this with trying to pack the court. we saw this with going after judges where there was an assassination attempt against justice kavanaugh after the roe

v. wade. what this and carrie is absolutely right president trump is going to win and he aafraid he will pick more judges. he will transformed the supreme court. one of his greatest accomplishments. he will win again. appoint more judges. better buckle up. >> judge jeanine: coming up, parents get busted after partying too hard on spring break. [shouting] >> sheriff's office, time to wake up. time to wake up. >> judge jeanine: what we just showed you isn't even the most disturbing part. the shocking video is next. ♪ e related macular degeneration could jeopardize my vision. great. one more thing to worry about. it was all too hard to deal with in the beginning, but making a plan with my doctor to add precision was easy. preservision areds2 contains the exact nei recommended, clinically proven nutrient formula to help reduce the risk of moderate to advanced amd progression. thanks to preservision, i feel better

that i'm doing something about it like millions of others. preservision. fox news is proud to bring you this she■s a hero moment. i knew i was interested in working with students who were easily excluded. part of my journey is responding to looks. we have to look out for each other. we have to take care of each other. dance is my safe space. i am autistic and i am a performer. and i'm really good at it. once we're in our own space and we get to create that space, it's really fun. i am here because i have seen women do it. if you can see her, you can be her. be

>> the sheriff's office, wake up! listen up! come on, get up. >> at first this looks like a couple who might have had a little too much fun partying on

spring break. passed out in the sun, beer cans around them. but florida sheriff's deputies noticed something was terribly wrong. >> you guys have children with you? are they with you? do you know where your kids are? how old are they? >> seven, eight. >> the kids are actually five and seven and at that moment nowhere to be found. deputies eventually spotted them swimming at a hotel pool nearby, save, and the couple was then arrested. >> i need you to come get the kids, we are both being arrested. >> why am i being arrested? >> alcohol on the beach, child

endangerment. >> not allowed to have beer on the beach? >> i'm glad he has his priorities straight. joining me now is the former nypd inspector in fox news contributor. what kind of charges should this couple be looking at? bmx justifiably serious. in florida this is a third-degree felony and it is a child neglect charge. that carries up to five years in florida. it's no joke. they are not florida residents so they have all kinds of complications. apparently they are from georgia, a couple but he's not the biological father. however he has legal guardianship so he's on the hook for this. they are looking at a serious set of charges, especially since at one point, is by claiming he's only had two beers and yet there's all kinds of empties littered around, he decides he's going to take off on the beach. he starts to run. he gets about five, six steps, face plants, it's charged. >> was take a look at the face plant.

>> okay, clearly need doesn't have his priorities together. the sad part about this is that not only were they just on the beach and they lost the kids, they were asleep. i assume they were drunk, we don't even know that. but i know that the sheriff's department, they are real good at what they do. but there's more of what was happening during the arrest. take a look. >> everybody else has been [ bleep ]. now we both go to [ bleep ] jail who is going to bail us out? >> no one. >> my grandpa has to drive [ bleep ] eight hours to get the [ bleep ] kids. i want to listen to what my grandpa says, i want to make sure my kids are [ bleep ] taking care of. >> now that she's up she cares about where her kids are?

>> she knows she's on camera so she's making a great show. they are quite belligerent after the arrest and i suspect that there will be some custody issues subsequent to this. none of this is going to play to their benefit. she starts cursing him out, he starts getting very nasty with the police. i don't think this is going to play very well in some civil custody situations. >> do we know whether or not he has a record? why would he run for something like that? >> i don't know and i don't know about his prior record but i will tell you that he puts up a big front that he's only had two beers, and yet as you see in the video he starts running, he doesn't get very far, you face plants without the cops even touching him and there are all of these empties around. she could not have drank them all. >> i would not be so sure about that, you never no. we've got something else we will take a listen to. >> there's no lease, he's not a squatter, breaking and entering, harboring criminals and fugitives in the house. >> i was brought in through real

estate. i have receipts and everything. this is insane. i'm not a squatter, i don't even know what that word means. >> it's moveo an issue in new york. a woman tries to get squatters out of her house by changing the locks. she owns a house. she ends up getting arrested by nypd after the squatter called the police. there's something up here. explain what's going on. >> this is one of those things where they are all doing this. the person gets arrested, unfortunately the only person who has any paperwork, which is the homeowner. she has a deed. i don't do this very often. a question the way this was handled. according to the reporting on another network they say to the alleged squatter, let's see your lease and he does not have one. >> thank you so much. that's ever us tonight. i'm judge a jeanine pirro in for laura ingram. edge me weekdays cohosting the five at 5:00 pm eastern. thank you for watching this speciaaddition of the ingram angle. welcome to "jesse watters primetime".

tonight...